The Lawsuits Thread
-
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
This video is made by an attorney who is active on twitter and was live streaming with the attorney I was watching. She made a video about the explanation of the appeals process if the ex were to appeal. She did a really good job explaining it in a way everyone can understand.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."
-
- JDZ Webmaster
- Posts: 27565
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 1:21 am
- Location: Houston, Texas
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
Ben and Camille were on a couple of the morning shows today--
-
- ONBC Moderator
- Posts: 3581
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:15 pm
- Location: under a pile of books
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
Thank you Theresa, my first chance to see these. I think both interviews were well done and both lawyers came across as the total professionals that they are.
"Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed and some few to be chewed and digested." Sir Francis Bacon, Of Studies
-
- Posts: 954
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:09 pm
- Location: Spain
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
I've just found this interview with Camille. I's in Spanish with subtitles in English.
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:41 pm
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
How do you bribe a UK High Court judge?
In the hypothetical situation where you wanted to bribe a UK High Court judge, how would you go about it? Do you hunt him down in a café, having a quiet coffee by himself, sit down and just lay it on him? Or would you be more discreet? Maybe approach him in a less public venue?
And what if you are well known yourself? You would want to do it out of the public’s view. Or you could use proxies. A mutual friend. Maybe a professional could be engaged to broker the bribe. Anything to maintain plausible deniability.
And what about the money trail? How do you obfuscate the records and hide the receipts? Maybe the currency isn’t strictly cash, maybe an asset or something valuable but less tangible – even a favour. Maybe it’s a quid pro quo deal. Or you could employ intermediaries to both handle the money and remove any direct connection between the parties. In a famous Australian case, a State Premier was bribed by a corporation, in full public view, under the guise of a defamation trial (settled before it made it to court). Criminals can be very clever and innovative. I’m sure anyone that has examined lots of such criminals in action would have seen many variations – those that did and didn’t work in a legal context.
The reason I ask is because it strikes me that other people would have to be involved. People will know things, and other people will know (or suspect) these people were complicit and have some basis for holding this belief. It could be something that was said. An unexplained money transfer. The HR department being told to hire someone. Evidence would be left in the wake. Even the wake itself tells us things – what paper trail should exist but has been erased? And if we can see where the trail starts and ends, we should be able to figure out where to look in between for trace evidence.
If we added up all the money/benefits we see changing hands, would could even determine just how much the verdict of a UK High Court judge is worth. And that’s something I think a lot of people would like to know.
In the hypothetical situation where you wanted to bribe a UK High Court judge, how would you go about it? Do you hunt him down in a café, having a quiet coffee by himself, sit down and just lay it on him? Or would you be more discreet? Maybe approach him in a less public venue?
And what if you are well known yourself? You would want to do it out of the public’s view. Or you could use proxies. A mutual friend. Maybe a professional could be engaged to broker the bribe. Anything to maintain plausible deniability.
And what about the money trail? How do you obfuscate the records and hide the receipts? Maybe the currency isn’t strictly cash, maybe an asset or something valuable but less tangible – even a favour. Maybe it’s a quid pro quo deal. Or you could employ intermediaries to both handle the money and remove any direct connection between the parties. In a famous Australian case, a State Premier was bribed by a corporation, in full public view, under the guise of a defamation trial (settled before it made it to court). Criminals can be very clever and innovative. I’m sure anyone that has examined lots of such criminals in action would have seen many variations – those that did and didn’t work in a legal context.
The reason I ask is because it strikes me that other people would have to be involved. People will know things, and other people will know (or suspect) these people were complicit and have some basis for holding this belief. It could be something that was said. An unexplained money transfer. The HR department being told to hire someone. Evidence would be left in the wake. Even the wake itself tells us things – what paper trail should exist but has been erased? And if we can see where the trail starts and ends, we should be able to figure out where to look in between for trace evidence.
If we added up all the money/benefits we see changing hands, would could even determine just how much the verdict of a UK High Court judge is worth. And that’s something I think a lot of people would like to know.
-
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
Boy, she sure knows how to pick 'em.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."
-
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
JD's friend talking about him when the verdict was read.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."
-
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
I thought she said that she just wants to get on with her life. Now she is doing interviews whining that social media was not fair to her and that the jury sided with him because he is a beloved actor.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/ex ... b80c1bc0a3
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/ex ... b80c1bc0a3
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."
-
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 8:06 am
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
She is never going to shut up.
Fair representation in social media - geez she has used and manipulated the media.
I am just watching the clip for the interview. She is now saying it's all because he is a beloved actor. I see her side are rolling back from claiming the jury were tainted by social media.
Still a first - she said something nice about him - well his acting skills anyway.
Fair representation in social media - geez she has used and manipulated the media.
I am just watching the clip for the interview. She is now saying it's all because he is a beloved actor. I see her side are rolling back from claiming the jury were tainted by social media.
Still a first - she said something nice about him - well his acting skills anyway.
-
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:50 pm
- Location: Iowa
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
OMG now AH is on the Today show I’m interview with Savanna Guthrie for the next 3 days and a special on Friday night why doesn’t she stop all this and with her doing all this is still damaging Johnny Why would he let her off the hook with the money while she’s doing this !!!!!!! Can Johnny waive the $8 million if she signs a shut the FU waiver or whatever It’s getting ridiculous with her Any thoughts ?
"This is the one I'll be remembered for"
Edward D. Wood, Jr.
Edward D. Wood, Jr.
-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:44 pm
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
I don't think it will work. She has not honored any agreement thus far with JD. She will never shut up until she destroys him. Some of her stans like Barlow, Proudman & Dauber are leading the charge of nastiness. This is far from over. Until we have legislation that accusers found guilty should be jailed & pay full restitution with interest to their victims. AH will hit every talk show there is. Her PR will keep her name in the headlines, crying oh woe is me.
-
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
After a while people will get tired of her. She just can't handle the fact that she lost his claim against her. The people have spoken and she doesn't like it. JD opened a Tik Tok account and had 2 million followers before he even posted anything. The more she does these interviews the more bad she looks, so let her go on and keep making a fool out of herself.Granna wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:03 amI don't think it will work. She has not honored any agreement thus far with JD. She will never shut up until she destroys him. Some of her stans like Barlow, Proudman & Dauber are leading the charge of nastiness. This is far from over. Until we have legislation that accusers found guilty should be jailed & pay full restitution with interest to their victims. AH will hit every talk show there is. Her PR will keep her name in the headlines, crying oh woe is me.
There are pics of her getting off a private plane in Virginia. Reports were that she went to New York City and left from New Jersey to go back to Virginia. Funny that she doesn't call the paps when she landed in New York. She isn't broke. No way should JD drop the money she owes him.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2019 3:01 am
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
I have frankly lost all faith in #metoo. I think it set out as a genuinely good movement to protect vulnerable young women in Hollywood and has turned into a man hating misogynistic toxic organisation. They are setting a terrible example. Abuse is abuse whatever the sex of the victim.
I am hoping Johnny gets some good bodyguards. Heard has the makings of another Patrizia Gucci. And I really think she should have been prosecuted for assaulting him. I'm seething that she seems to have used her gender to get away with what is a serious crime.
I am hoping Johnny gets some good bodyguards. Heard has the makings of another Patrizia Gucci. And I really think she should have been prosecuted for assaulting him. I'm seething that she seems to have used her gender to get away with what is a serious crime.
-
- Posts: 1686
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
Sadly I just don’t believe Savannah Gunthrie is going to push back on her enough. Twice Amber said 3 1/2 weeks for the trial and Savannah didn’t say oh but you also had equal amount of time to present your case. They’re going to let Amber re-try this case, fabricate this case in the interview. We saw pap photos of Amber carrying a folder of documents. They’re going to allow her to present the evidence that was not admissible, carte blanche, no opposition from Johnny’s team and Savannah is a lawyer and knows better. Elaine already alluded to some of this evidence. She is going to bring in Judge Nichol vile judgement with no opposition or explanation why it wasn’t allowed.
-
- Posts: 6294
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 12:15 pm
- Location: South
- Status: Offline
The Lawsuits Thread
I agree he should not drop money she owes him. I have a feeling he will be losing money because of her. Sadly she’s not through with him yet.ForeverYoung wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 11:19 amAfter a while people will get tired of her. She just can't handle the fact that she lost his claim against her. The people have spoken and she doesn't like it. JD opened a Tik Tok account and had 2 million followers before he even posted anything. The more she does these interviews the more bad she looks, so let her go on and keep making a fool out of herself.Granna wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:03 amI don't think it will work. She has not honored any agreement thus far with JD. She will never shut up until she destroys him. Some of her stans like Barlow, Proudman & Dauber are leading the charge of nastiness. This is far from over. Until we have legislation that accusers found guilty should be jailed & pay full restitution with interest to their victims. AH will hit every talk show there is. Her PR will keep her name in the headlines, crying oh woe is me.
There are pics of her getting off a private plane in Virginia. Reports were that she went to New York City and left from New Jersey to go back to Virginia. Funny that she doesn't call the paps when she landed in New York. She isn't broke. No way should JD drop the money she owes him.
"Hello South Carolina" ...............*swoon*