The fact that a person in the UK who lost a case has to ask permission to appeal before the judge who made the initial decision is really ridiculous and makes no sense to me at all.



This was great. I finally got to watch it this morning. Their explanation is spot on why UK single judge trial was so risky and the explanation of “motivational reasoning”. Basically in this #metoo era, judge personally couldn’t find for an older male who uses drugs and abused alcohol against a young popular female actress. Johnny never had a chance with this judge. They also talk as much as they agree he has stand for an appeal, in UK he has to receive permission to proceed which is different then in USA
Hi justintime. I know that you were probably just being facetious, but I am a legal dummy, so I looked it up. I thought that it was true that you were under oath. Yes. So, perjury is also a factor, as I thought I remembered.justintime wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 4:04 pmI am probably off base here, BUT wasn’t AH asked at some point, during a deposition perhaps, to identify the voices she had been asked to listen to on an audio tape being played for her? And she clearly identified one as “Johnny” and the other as herself? Weren’t those audio tapes the ones determined inadmissible as testimony for not being made under oath? Are depositions made under oath?
I get that. But they’re very clear new strategy is she left marriage behind and all this public fighting is him still abusing her. She is still the victim. Don’t hate her. Don’t blame her. It’s all Johnny wanting revenge and never moving on. It’s a terrible article taking him down but lifting her up with no quotes from her. Just Kaplan basically calling us all with Depp insane and vengeful