The Lawsuits Thread

Discuss the latest Johnny Depp news, his career, past and future projects, and other related issues.
Granny576
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2020 1:43 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Granny576 » Wed Apr 01, 2020 1:44 am

It seems to me that AH reads these threads and modifies her behavior. Baking bread, posing with little girl? Just a little leg up with no underware for the men. Copies Johnny's statements as her own. Her generosity was always Johnny's leading to help her show well. Nice, has never been her strong suite.

Granny576
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2020 1:43 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Granny576 » Wed Apr 01, 2020 1:01 pm

The subpoena for Disney concerns me greatly. Disney doesn't want any part of this. Kaplan is not above coercion. Now we are hearing that Disney did not release him but rather are thinking of having him play Jack Sparrow again. In spite of his behavior in Australia. Amber, again was responsible. He has the reputation. To the point. Going to court with the Disney deniel of dismissal nonexistent will the suite be dropped? Because (intent to harm) would be gone.

User avatar
myfave
Posts: 6205
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 12:15 pm
Location: South
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by myfave » Wed Apr 01, 2020 1:09 pm

Where did you get the info about Disney? Sorry if I missed it.
"Hello South Carolina" ...............*swoon*

Granna
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:44 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Granna » Wed Apr 01, 2020 1:23 pm

Please, relax.

Another bullying tactic by Heard & Co.

The P.I., they hired to get "dirt" on JD, failed. They went back 30+ years, talked to over 100 people. They found NOTHING on JD.

People had MUCH to say about AH, though. (Not very nice either).

Heard & Co., are getting desperate.

Please remember, two of the men, who own a chunk of Disney stock and are very pro AH. One of them owns the Sun, which JD is suing in the UK. The other one, represents AH in Hollywood. Both men, have been trying to destroy JD since the beginning, their reputations are in peril. Both of these men want JD out of the POTC and ALL Disney related ventures.

User avatar
Moonbeam
Posts: 2153
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: Neverland
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Moonbeam » Wed Apr 01, 2020 1:37 pm

I can see this is being discussed, but I thought I would provide a link to the article that I am reading about AH hiring a PI to dig up dirt on Johnny.

"Music touches us emotionally, where words alone can't."-- "The truth will come out...and I will be standing on the other side of the roaring rapids. I hope other people will too." --Johnny Depp #justiceforjohnnydepp

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:27 pm

Moonbeam wrote:
Wed Apr 01, 2020 1:37 pm
I can see this is being discussed, but I thought I would provide a link to the article that I am reading about AH hiring a PI to dig up dirt on Johnny.

Simply glorious. He could find nothing


But Barresi said he couldn't find anyone who had a bad word to say against Depp, 56, even after interviewing over 100 people across the US and Europe who had worked with Depp on films dating back 30 years.

Amber's lawyers contacted me and said you're the right man for this job, that's how they brought me in. She was emotionally spent and battered and tormented - it was a volatile relationship,' Barresi told DailyMail.com.

But he admitted: 'I went to the US, France, Italy, Britain, everywhere that Johnny Depp roamed, everywhere he walked, I couldn't find one instance, or at least an admitted one, where he was physically abusive to a woman, smacked or beaten around, he's like an angel. Not one who said a deprecating thing.

'I interviewed dozens of people, who knew him going as far back as three decades ago, and nobody had one bad thing to say about him. In fact, they couldn't say enough about his ever flowing outpouring of generosity and tender heart.'

A spokesperson for Heard said: 'Mr Barresi hasn't been involved with Ms Heard's team since he was let go last year, and his account is entirely inconsistent with the testimony of multiple witnesses.'

In an email, Barresi gave DailyMail.com examples of the plaudits to Depp, writing: 'Jane Galli, head of the make up department on City Of Lies had nothing but praise for Depp. She had worked with him in the past on Public Enemy and Pirates. 'She said: ''He's a real sweetie.''

'City of Lies director Brad Furman told me Johnny was a true professional and wonderful human being in every sense of the word and assistant director Paul Silver told me although Johnny was not always on time, held up the shoot sometimes, he was a professional and always delivered.

'I asked Silver whether Depp ever lost his cool, Silver said: ''All artists have a temper''.'
Not the whole article. Includes update with spokesperson for Heard

Note: as Adam said the lawyers were working together with Rocky’s case and he specifically mentions he found nothing to support that claim

Total backfire 😂😂😂

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:56 pm

Update from Mirror


Johnny Depp's lawyer told us: "Since Amber Heard's own stories are lies, her legal eagles had a bright idea: hire a former gay porn star private investigator to dig up dirt on Johnny Depp.

"Yet as this private investigator, like Amber Heard’s other employees, friends and witnesses surrender to the truth, The Sun soldiers on as a key co-conspirator promoting her abuse hoax. We will soon discover why."
https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity- ... r-21795888

Granna
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:44 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Granna » Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:11 pm

After spending a large sum of money on Barresi; interviewing people that JD has worked with, over 30+ years, Barresi's expenses, etc., Barresi was fired by Heard & Co., because he did not do his job.
(NO DIRT TO BE FOUND.)

IF Kaplan says there are multiple witnesses that say otherwise, that would have been fed to the media sources that are pro AH, long ago.

AH should come clean, admit the hoax, lies and extortion attempt, serve her jail time and move on. This should also include all of her partners in crime. They all need to serve time.

User avatar
Moonbeam
Posts: 2153
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: Neverland
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Moonbeam » Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:27 pm

Granna wrote:
Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:11 pm
AH should come clean, admit the hoax, lies and extortion attempt, serve her jail time and move on.
I truly believe AH to be a narcissistic sociopath. They will do anything to squirm out of admitting that they are wrong or have done anything wrong. She needs to be prosecuted and jailed for perjury, at the very least.
There are numerous videos on the subject of narcissistic and sociopathic narcissistic abuse on YouTube and elsewhere. It all sounds so familiar.
For your reading pleasure, here are 2 articles that describe this person to a tee.



"Music touches us emotionally, where words alone can't."-- "The truth will come out...and I will be standing on the other side of the roaring rapids. I hope other people will too." --Johnny Depp #justiceforjohnnydepp

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:31 pm

Adam Waldman referred to questionable practices with Murdoch’s son and Elon Musk Tesla Board but I didn’t realize they were considering him to replace Elon



Adam Waldman, a US lawyer for Mr Depp who is not representing him in the libel claim, said in a statement after the hearing: “The desperate Sun tabloid read out a text today without realising how much profound truth it contained.

“That text, in which Mr Depp speculates that Elon Musk is secretly supporting Amber Heard’s hoax, is curious in light of this fact: The Murdochs own the Sun, and a Murdoch serves on Elon Musk’s Tesla board of directors.
. https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingn ... 89207.html

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1651
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Online

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:27 pm

I don't know why but I have a gut feeling Elon Musk is involved here as a "co-conspirator."
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
Judymac
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 6:23 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Judymac » Wed Apr 01, 2020 8:02 pm

Moonbeam wrote:
Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:27 pm
Granna wrote:
Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:11 pm
AH should come clean, admit the hoax, lies and extortion attempt, serve her jail time and move on.
I truly believe AH to be a narcissistic sociopath. They will do anything to squirm out of admitting that they are wrong or have done anything wrong. She needs to be prosecuted and jailed for perjury, at the very least.
There are numerous videos on the subject of narcissistic and sociopathic narcissistic abuse on YouTube and elsewhere. It all sounds so familiar.
For your reading pleasure, here are 2 articles that describe this person to a tee.



Unfortunately the only reason she could go to jail in the U.S. would be perjury. The statute of limitations has expired on the domestic violence events. She could not be prosecuted in a criminal trial for domestic violence.

User avatar
Judymac
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 6:23 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Judymac » Wed Apr 01, 2020 8:25 pm

ForeverYoung wrote:
Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:50 am
If he is awarded a sum of money and the judge files the order against her then she has to pay and if she doesn't then the lawyers will go after her not for Johnny but so that they can get paid. The lawyers take their contingency fees before the client gets the check.

If she gets a judgement against her, the lawyers can garnish a percentage of her wages, or she can be ordered to pay a certain amount of money every month. This is a court ordered judgement. She can not just get out of paying because she does not have it or does not want to pay it. It does not matter that she will not have the full amount, she will be forced to pay it off on time.

User avatar
Judymac
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 6:23 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Judymac » Wed Apr 01, 2020 8:45 pm

Granny576 wrote:
Wed Apr 01, 2020 1:01 pm
The subpoena for Disney concerns me greatly. Disney doesn't want any part of this. Kaplan is not above coercion. Now we are hearing that Disney did not release him but rather are thinking of having him play Jack Sparrow again. In spite of his behavior in Australia. Amber, again was responsible. He has the reputation. To the point. Going to court with the Disney deniel of dismissal nonexistent will the suite be dropped? Because (intent to harm) would be gone.

I don't think it will result in the dismissal of the suit. First, Disney has not confirmed that he is going to play Captain Jack Sparrow again. I know there are rumors that he is going to play Captain Jack again but until Disney confirms it is just a rumor. Courts do not act on rumors. Also, there are multiple parts to this lawsuit. One part is that Amber Heard accused him of being an abuser. That has not changed and it is the reason the lawsuit will go on. If he gets an a monetary award, then they bring in loss of income when the decide how much money to award him. The winner of a lawsuit does not automatically get the amount that they ask for. It is up to the judge to make the monetary award, and loss of income is one of the considerations. I am not good at explaining things so I hope this makes sense.

I personally do not think he would even be negotiating with Disney right now. I think his attorneys would probably tell him that it could affect any award he might get in his civil suit against Amber Heard.

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Wed Apr 01, 2020 9:11 pm

My understanding in defamation of a public figure includes Harm. He has to show her OpEd harmed him, thus loss of work he claims of $50m