

I'm not sure what the behavior is referred to in psychology..."projection" maybe? But all through these recordings, as well, as reading her documents, Amber Heard's pattern of defense, always has been reversing their actions in their relationship. In other words, her complaints, accusations, etc that she accuses Johnny of doing, she actually is the one guilty of exhibiting that behavior. It must have been very frustrating for Johnny during these times, being at the receiving end of much emotional abuse on top of her hitting, punching and throwing objects at him. The emotional abuse, calling him fat, washed up and no longer wanted for work, is horribly cruel. I think, as ForeverYoung pointed out, Johnny's final words to Amber stating that she "didn't exist" had to hit hard because she didn't expect him fighting back. Personally, I loved that he told her off. He didn't call her names, he didn't say anything about her weight or her slow moving career or even that she partied too much. No, he told her she didn't exist to him anymore. The powerful impact of those words were well earned.ForeverYoung wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:12 amAmber Heard is one of the most manipulative women I have ever experienced outside of film. She accused Johnny of leaking info to TMZ. He got really upset and told her she didn't exist and was just a made up thing in his head and then she had the nerve to tell him he was being cruel and she was just defending herself. I was so happy when he responded "You're defending yourself against something I didn't f**kn' do and I'm not gonna sit here and argue with you because I know this sh*t will go on forever. You have been nothing but cruel and I will see you in court" and this whole time she was still screaming that she was defending herself.![]()
![]()
1 DAY AGO
53 NOTES
REBLOG | #THESE ARE ALL VERY VERY GOOD POINTS #DONT FALL FOR THE DISINFORMATION TRAP
damiana-midnight:
OK, so I’ve noticed a few things in the past few days and it seems that the justice for Johnny Depp movement is losing a little steam because it is getting defused into nonsense energy drains. Some of this is strategy by Amber Heard’s PR campaign. It’s not just the bots, trolls, and probably several fake stans. There is a point to every single thing that they are doing, and some of you are falling for it. Here’s what you need to look out for:
Deflection: that is any Stan, bot, or troll that likes to use the “mutual abuse“ argument or say that Amber was using self-defense. Any random argument like that to get you spun up and arguing about the wrong thing. All they’re doing is detracting from the fact that she admitted what she did. They don’t want thinking people to know that that’s out there, so they keep those of us aware arguing about the finer points.
Disinformation: that is all the stans, bots, and trolls who like to throw out fake evidence that he abused her, or things that don’t even exist. By now you have seen many many arguments of people using things that have not happened. That includes some of the things that she has said, but now they are making up stuff as well. Do not retweet/reblog those comments! All that does is spread the disinformation.
Distraction: that is anybody pulling up non sequiturs and things that make no sense and seem to come out of nowhere. People who want to get you into a conversation about random things that are not relevant to the actual discussion.
The bottom line is this: when we all stood together and used the justice for Johnny Depp hashtag, even with Amber Heard is an abuser, it worked because everybody was using the same hashtags and it hadn’t got bogged down into 1 million different ones. It also worked because once it started trending, people who were unaware of the case suddenly sat up and started paying attention. Then it spread like wild fire. The problem is, all of the haters are now watching those hashtags so we have to change tactics.
The best course of action now is to do one of two things – – either start posting the links to the audio on trending hashtag’s so that the word gets out to more people, or keep your focus on the organizations that represent Amber Heard and keep the pressure on them to have her removed. It’s fine if you want to split your energy between both, but trying to combat the haters will not work. All it does is distract you, and keep disinformation circling, especially when you are retweeting their lies. Do not fall for this!
It is unnecessary to argue with stans or bots that are either paid for or put out there to spread disinformation in the first place. Don’t do their job for them.
Keep the audio links spreading like wildfire so that more and more people can wake up and pay attention. When they start coming on board, and circulating the information, eventually the media and her sponsors will have to pay attention because of the sheer numbers. And by letting her organizations know that we are not going to let up, they will have to at least put her on the back burner if not let her go entirely.
By that point they will know the people have spoken. The important point now is to not defuse and waste your energy. Keep up the good fight Deppheads!
I have been in touch with JodysCorner.com and made a donation because I really appreciate his fight for the truth here. He said that he felt the truth needed to be told and he will continue with the truth if the story escalates. Stay tuned because I think there is more to come from him.ForeverYoung wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:34 pmThanks for posting this video. I watched it quite a few times and that guy cracks me up. I especially like the part about him labeling Amber as a psychotic gold digging POS.![]()
I also liked what he said about the Depp fans at 2:04 and what he wants to see happen to her career at 2:26.![]()
Has Kaplan gone completely off the rails? Are attorneys-of-record not subject to restraint when it comes to openly engaging in their client’s friends’ poisonous “on the net” misinformation campaign?Lbock wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:56 pmThere is a blatant misinformation campaign now against Johnny's recounting of events and against those audio tapes believe it or not. "Bloggers" and Indie journalists are saying these prove she was the victim and we shouldn't blindly turn in his favor.
FYI, these "journalists" are actively seeking out and blocking Depp support accounts to prevent us from commenting and correcting their lies.
AND WORSE, not only is Kaplan retweeting them, but@ MeTooMVMT is actively promoting them too
Va. House passes bill aimed at lawsuits by Devin Nunes, Johnny Depp
The Virginia House passed a bill Tuesday that would make it harder to pursue frivolous lawsuits designed to chill free speech, a response to a string of splashy defamation cases filed in state courts by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), actor Johnny Depp and others.
The Senate was set to take up a similar measure in the evening.
Free speech advocates cheered the legislation in the House and Senate, saying the state’s weak anti-defamation law has made Virginia a magnet for dubious litigation aimed at punishing critics and blunting aggressive media coverage on topics of public concern.
Nunes, Depp and other litigants have filed defamation cases seeking nearly $1 billion in damages in courts in Virginia over the past year. Their targets include CNN, the New York Times, Twitter, the actress Amber Heard, the Fresno Bee and a parody Twitter account in the voice of an imaginary cow.
Nunes and Depp both claim they have been wrongly smeared and say they have good reasons to pursue litigation in Virginia. But defendants and critics say the suits are without merit and the venues were chosen to take advantage of Virginia law.
They say the state does not have an effective mechanism for getting frivolous defamation suits dismissed quickly, meaning someone with deep pockets can harass a defendant with expensive and protracted litigation. Such cases are known as strategic lawsuits against public participation, or SLAPP.
Virginia’s new anti-SLAPP bills would afford defendants stronger protections. Provisions in the House and Senate bills would allow defendants to file a special motion to dismiss a lawsuit after it has been served, if the defendant believes the goal of the lawsuit is to stifle free speech on a topic of civic interest.
The move would pause discovery in cases, which is expensive and time-consuming, and trigger a hearing before a judge. If the defendant prevails on the motion to dismiss, the defendant would automatically be awarded attorneys’ fees under the House bill or could be awarded them in the Senate version.
Del. Schuyler T. VanValkenburg (D-Henrico) said he sponsored the House bill because as a civics teacher, he was concerned about First Amendment rights being thwarted through litigation.
“Shutting down speech, I found that offensive,” VanValkenburg said. “Suing someone and getting them into court kind of cuts against everything I stand for.”
Last March, Nunes filed a $250 million defamation suit in Henrico County, accusing Twitter of censoring him and allowing users — including one parody account in the voice of an imaginary cow — to defame him.
“Devin’s boots are full of manure,” read one of the offending tweets by the cow account cited in the lawsuit. “He’s udder-ly worthless and its pasture time to move him to prison.”
Other defamation suits followed against the Fresno Bee, CNN and others over reporting in stories and online commentary about the pieces.
Nunes and his attorney did not respond to requests for comment.
Last April, Depp sued Heard, his ex-wife,in a $50 million defamation case in Fairfax County. Depp claimed the actress falsely implied he had abused her in an op-ed in The Washington Post about domestic abuse.
“Johnny Depp brought his defamation case in Virginia because Virginia is where that Washington Post was printed, Virginia is where the online version of that Washington Post was created, and Virginia is where the servers that routed that Washington Post to the rest of the world are located,” Adam Waldman, an attorney for the actor, wrote in a statement.
While the bills are broadly similar, they differ on key details. If the Senate approves its measure, both bills will move to the opposite chamber for consideration and the hammering out of any differences before possibly heading to the governor for signing.
Alison Friedman, of the Protect the Protest task force that is backing the bills, said she is guardedly optimistic about passage. “Substantively, all the parts for a strong anti-SLAPP bill are there, but half are in the House bill and half are in the Senate bill so it’s really going to come down to conference,” Friedman said.