The Lawsuits Thread

Discuss the latest Johnny Depp news, his career, past and future projects, and other related issues.
hollyberry
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2019 3:01 am
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by hollyberry » Mon Jun 06, 2022 12:51 pm

I'm not interested in whatever she did to get money in the past, but I am very interested in the possibility of a former male partner spilling a few beans - I am absolutely sure she has a history of abusing more than the one partner.

Pleased that in the UK there is a petition going for Johnny regrading the Sun trial, I'm going to look for it. :heart3:

justintime
Posts: 1988
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 6:39 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by justintime » Mon Jun 06, 2022 1:22 pm

ForeverYoung wrote:
Mon Jun 06, 2022 8:10 am
She had her chance to end the divorce peacefully and out of the spotlight but she refused. They could have ended it where they settle amicably and they both go on with their lives, but no, she wasn't having any of it. Now, six years later, she was on the stand saying she just wants to get on with her life. I have no sympathy for her.
Unless or until Johnny chooses to flesh out the ubiquitous, poisonous hoax tentacles and the vermin they have served for far longer than six years, I will remain content with the Jury’s decision.

The last six words of your post, ForeverYoung, will remain etched in my brain and on my heart into perpetuity: “….I have no sympathy for her.”

Agreed. Nor will I, ever. Not a :censored: ounce. That’s my bottom line.
"Stay low." ~ JD
"I don't like it in here . . . it's terribly crowded." ~ Hatter
"There's something about Johnny that breaks your heart." ~ John Logan, ST
"Tear deeper, Mother." ~ Wilmot

hollyberry
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2019 3:01 am
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by hollyberry » Mon Jun 06, 2022 1:54 pm

justintime wrote:
Mon Jun 06, 2022 1:22 pm
ForeverYoung wrote:
Mon Jun 06, 2022 8:10 am
She had her chance to end the divorce peacefully and out of the spotlight but she refused. They could have ended it where they settle amicably and they both go on with their lives, but no, she wasn't having any of it. Now, six years later, she was on the stand saying she just wants to get on with her life. I have no sympathy for her.
Unless or until Johnny chooses to flesh out the ubiquitous, poisonous hoax tentacles and the vermin they have served for far longer than six years, I will remain content with the Jury’s decision.

The last six words of your post, ForeverYoung, will remain etched in my brain and on my heart into perpetuity: “….I have no sympathy for her.”

Agreed. Nor will I, ever. Not a :censored: ounce. That’s my bottom line.
Seconded. I have decided to celebrate Johnny's victory over a lying sociopath by drinking a large glass of port and watching my favourite film of his 'Sweeney Todd'. Cheers.

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1952
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Mon Jun 06, 2022 2:45 pm

Inquiring Minds wrote:
Mon Jun 06, 2022 10:11 am
Granna wrote:
Hollyberry: it's ok. Don't let them make you go bananas. We all knew this would happen. As JD said he knows there will those who will always believe he is an abuser, no matter what the evidence. Australia is still investigating - hopefully they will find her guilty - ban her from traveling there let alone getting work visas. As far as the UK, there is a petition to ask the High court to consider all the evidence. Sherborn has been collecting info compliments of JR. We can certainly hope.
The new stuff about her driving with a suspended license and the guy named Steven, is now coming to light. More info on her being a stripper as well.
Apparently another man whom she dated before JD is considering to come forward and talk. It seems JD wasn't the only male who had issues with her. Just let the truth unfold. MSM will not be able to stop it or spin it. It's the truth.


Guy named Steven? 50-cent-stripper info? Any links please? I've also been expecting a lot more to come out now that JD's name has been cleared.
JD referred to her as a 50 cent stripper in one of his texts and she brought it up when she was blaming him for releasing things to the media. She did porn, so being a stripper wouldn't surprise me. I'm not going to post any of the porn links because first of all, I'm sure admin. wouldn't like that ;) and second of all they are disgusting.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

Inquiring Minds
Posts: 247
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:41 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Inquiring Minds » Mon Jun 06, 2022 7:30 pm

ForeverYoung wrote:
JD referred to her as a 50 cent stripper in one of his texts and she brought it up when she was blaming him for releasing things to the media. She did porn, so being a stripper wouldn't surprise me. I'm not going to post any of the porn links because first of all, I'm sure admin. wouldn't like that ;) and second of all they are disgusting.
I knew about the 50-cent-stripper stuff, but no details (because they didn't seem to be out there). I'm pretty certain that was during her NY time, after Tx but before LA. I suspect she finished school and graduated there (online or evening classes). Continuing along this line I see her studying during the day and stripping at night. If stripping, I would say the likelihood of there being additional, unknown assault charges is high. She said someone in NY pointed her to an audition in LA (in my mind this is one of her regular lapdance customers).

Likewise, her early time in LA is a bit of a mystery - a few iffy posts from Ray Leone, but very little else. I thought the "guy called Steven" might be a new lead.

She's done porn? I've seen nude clips from her films out on Pornhub and similar, but as the hatred runs deep, I really haven't checked them or have any desire to seek them out. I've done endless searches on her name for news, pap photos etc but never through porn sites, and as I said, I have no interest. I've always thought she could maybe do porn now that her rep is in the gutter, but if I'm typical, she will need a mask to even make money in that genre. It's hubris, she did this to herself and (as others here have expressed), I have zero sympathy for her.

I also agree with others here that unless she and any co-conspirators are totally buried, these slanders will keep coming in waves (so far these seem to peak about every 2 years - 2016 [original hoax], 2018 [WaPo], 2020 [UK trial], 2022 [VA trial]). In fairness, she didn't pick the court dates.

And we have all seen her escalate her claims with each attack - the UK trial saw 2 rapes and a SA added to the DV allegations (plus she threw in the KM stair BS). The bottle rape was added to VA (along with the previous Oz rape accusations, and doubling down on the KM rumour she created). No telling what her next claims will be.

I have noted a tweet from Eve saying how poor little AH was forced to testify about her rape in open court, yet no-one knew of the bottle rape accusation until EB's opening statements (the look on JD's face when mentioned said it all). Closed testimony was given in the UK because the charges had already been made before the trial started, in VA the allegations were made with no notice. Given the Judge's desire to make the trial open and public, I am not surprised there were no closed sessions. Even proposing a closed session is a problem under these circumstances - it looks like she is avoiding full scrutiny. Like the anti-SLAPP implications, you don't have enough information until the jury returns a verdict eg if a jury decides you were raped, testifying in open court would be potentially traumatic, if its all lies, they need to be heard in open court and exposed to all. Its a real Catch-22.

Yaya
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 3:23 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Yaya » Mon Jun 06, 2022 7:58 pm

This is an excellent article about the huge disparity between the opinions of various publications and that of the public.

https://link.medium.com/vfv52DfXDqb

justintime
Posts: 1988
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 6:39 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by justintime » Mon Jun 06, 2022 9:21 pm

Yaya wrote:
Mon Jun 06, 2022 7:58 pm
This is an excellent article about the huge disparity between the opinions of various publications and that of the public.

https://link.medium.com/vfv52DfXDqb
Thank you, Yaya, for that link. Medium articles are so often a worthwhile read. I have to admit I was beginning to wonder how Reynier the Fox (author) was going to tie it all together when out pop those tidy, last four paragraphs. All the weeds left behind. Well done!
"Stay low." ~ JD
"I don't like it in here . . . it's terribly crowded." ~ Hatter
"There's something about Johnny that breaks your heart." ~ John Logan, ST
"Tear deeper, Mother." ~ Wilmot

merlin
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2022 10:16 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by merlin » Mon Jun 06, 2022 10:21 pm

Thank you, Yaya, for posting the link to that article. It was great. Reading that made me feel better. :loveshower: :myheart:

hollyberry
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2019 3:01 am
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by hollyberry » Tue Jun 07, 2022 2:59 am

Well, glad to see that there are decent people writing for 'Medium', I've been reading UK news sites and the support for Johnny is overwhelming, ninety per cent in fact, and many of his supporters are female abuse victims...one said Heard's behaviour was very like that of her male abuser.

JD was in my home city yesterday enjoying a curry and being as generous with his time and money as he always has been. :bouquet:

gipsyblues
Posts: 600
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:36 am
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by gipsyblues » Tue Jun 07, 2022 10:17 am

Thank you very much Yaya :hug: ,
a really well written and honest article, straight to the point. :applause2:

User avatar
In-too-Depp
Posts: 171323
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:20 pm
Location: Walking my beat in deepest UK
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by In-too-Depp » Tue Jun 07, 2022 12:36 pm



:applause:
And Wit, was his vain frivolous pretence
Of pleasing others, at his own expense

Rochester ,"Satyr" on Man

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1660
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Tue Jun 07, 2022 2:19 pm

I am so very happy for Camille

User avatar
Jackslady
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: The Captain's Cabin
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Jackslady » Tue Jun 07, 2022 4:43 pm

Yes me too, congratulations Camille. :spin:
"Easy on the goods darlin!"
"Tis not an easy thing to be entirely happy, but to be kind is very easy, and that is the greatest measure of happiness"-John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester

*Special thanks to es for help with my lovely avatar*

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1660
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Tue Jun 07, 2022 5:30 pm

So, Jessica Meyers (Johnny's lawyer) filed his opposition to the ACLU $86K (a thread with links to documents)
Seems the privilege log has Nadelhoft mentioned quite a bit. ACLU, it is claimed, was helping with Amber's VA case.

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1952
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Tue Jun 07, 2022 7:13 pm

And the curse of the ex rises again, this time with the ACLU. No way are they entitled to the time they spent on reviewing, redacting, etc. If they labeled documents "attorney client privilege" to the ones they did not produce then that means she was their client and they should be billing her for their time.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."