The Lawsuits Thread

Discuss the latest Johnny Depp news, his career, past and future projects, and other related issues.
Someareborn
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:16 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Someareborn » Wed Nov 03, 2021 4:03 pm

So, the DPP has to actively bring a case. But, can't the DPP bring the case now? We basically "know" that she lied about the donations and the dogs. Do we need to wait for the outcome of the trial in VA? I assumed her testimony in the UK combined with the findings already proved that she committed perjury?

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1602
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:58 pm

We don’t have the court order yet, but Page Six reporting that Johnny gets access to AH phone, but AH doesn’t get his phone or computer. And Elaine continues to lie to the court Re the AH IT expert for NGN trial. Please see Twitter post and comments for more info abs images of documents

Kathelyndecoke
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 4:45 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Kathelyndecoke » Fri Nov 05, 2021 5:47 am

Thank you for this excellent news !!!!! I can't see how she could not provide at least the devices provided for the UK trial especially when Elaine stated that she took proactive steps to preserve the integrity of her "evidence"...so the draft? The TMZ video? All the recordings? All photos?
Last edited by Joni on Fri Nov 05, 2021 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Please use proper capitalization.

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1602
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:44 am

We haven’t gotten the actual order yet but I’m hoping it’s all the devices Johnny asked for. And the judge said her request was too broad; so I’m sure she’ll be filing to amend it and still try to get his phone etc

Inquiring Minds
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2020 10:41 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Inquiring Minds » Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:28 pm

The MSM seems to be turning, even though not yet an about turn. I suspect they are seeing the writing on the wall and their lawyers have tipped JD will probably win. They have months to backpedal before VA; and then they can make out they were really just for truth and justice all along. Ohh, and its not really about who was telling the truth and who was the violent one, its really about the narrative and The Greater Good......and all the while raking in the clicks and revenue, following the money wherever it flows and damn any ethics that get in the way.

An Australian article via the New York Post:

AdeleAgain
Posts: 1167
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 8:06 am
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by AdeleAgain » Sat Nov 06, 2021 5:54 am

Yes a google search on her is quite stunning now - and the media hasn't twisted this around so much - they could have gone with "AH's Lawyer Confirms Integrity of Evidence Maintained" or "Desperate Depp Makes Another Bid To Harrass Ex" ..............

After events of a year ago however, I am still worried she will get away with this.

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1826
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Sun Nov 07, 2021 11:01 pm

AdeleAgain wrote:
Sat Nov 06, 2021 5:54 am
Yes a google search on her is quite stunning now - and the media hasn't twisted this around so much - they could have gone with "AH's Lawyer Confirms Integrity of Evidence Maintained" or "Desperate Depp Makes Another Bid To Harrass Ex" ..............

After events of a year ago however, I am still worried she will get away with this.
She isn't doing so well after four attempts to having the case dismissed. Also, her law team is doing a terrible job trying to drag the UK decision after this after the VA judge already said that ruling does not apply in the VA courts and that JD did not get a fair trial.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1602
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:55 am

A new protective order was uploaded and it is dated 6/21/21

Note: Updates have been really random since Judge A took over. Maybe her clerk is overloaded getting things to the person to upload to the website. IDK. But when they are finally uploaded, the fall to their recorded date. So I have to scroll down quite aways to catch older orders that only recently were uploaded

I don't know when this was uploaded, I just happen to catch it the other day

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/s ... 1-2021.pdf

They can use confidential documents in depositions.

This appears to provide near blanket permission to submit evidence and designate it as Confidential without having much basis. Team AH will designate everything to hide and team Depp will have to fight to de-designate for EVERYTHING. Information re: medical/psychological diagnoses, private journal entries, or even extraneous information that happens to be submitted ALONGSIDE confidential information can be designated per this doc.

In addition (specifically to the UK case) So that confidential judgement in UK related to AHs accusations of sexual assault - the UK judge ruled that anything relating to this would be confidential and not made public. Anything JN marked confidential in UK will now be confidential in VA along with any new evidence that they find relating to these matters.

AdeleAgain
Posts: 1167
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 8:06 am
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by AdeleAgain » Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:57 pm

Thanks Lbock as always for keeping us updated.

Amuses me no end how the person who tried to play the entire saga in 2016 in the press now wants to keep things confidential. And Elaine complaining about JD's side litigating in the press is breathtaking.

User avatar
Moonbeam
Posts: 2153
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: Neverland
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Moonbeam » Fri Nov 12, 2021 5:22 pm

"Music touches us emotionally, where words alone can't."-- "The truth will come out...and I will be standing on the other side of the roaring rapids. I hope other people will too." --Johnny Depp #justiceforjohnnydepp

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1602
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Fri Nov 12, 2021 6:30 pm

Johnny is getting pretty much everything he asked for. All her devices phones, laptop, iPads, computer, and access to her cloud. She has to provide him all communications on those including texts emails photos audio videos. The only thing that was changed from his request is his expert gets to witness her EXPERT pull all the data then it goes to the conciliator and then he decides what will go to Johnnys Expert

Her tequest was denied.

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/s ... 8-2021.pdf

Granna
Posts: 323
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:44 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Granna » Fri Nov 12, 2021 7:26 pm

Lbock: Must everything go through the conciliator from this point on?

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1602
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Fri Nov 12, 2021 7:27 pm

Pretty much. Not sure about the Limine motions. But all discovery disputes. I can only guess the device stuff they want declassified might go to judge as conciliator was the one who chooses the files.

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1826
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Fri Nov 12, 2021 8:55 pm

This is getting good, especially because is word on twitter that the pictures she produced came from an iPhone that did not exist in 2016. :popcorn: :yikes: :smh:
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

Granna
Posts: 323
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:44 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Granna » Fri Nov 12, 2021 8:59 pm

Yes. Guess who outed that info? EB herself. The expert witness for NGN in the UK trial told the judge some of the photos submitted as proof had indeed been edited