The Lawsuits Thread

Discuss the latest Johnny Depp news, his career, past and future projects, and other related issues.
MaryS
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue May 05, 2020 8:16 am
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by MaryS » Mon May 25, 2020 2:03 am

I can just see it now that this hoax is going to be made into a movie, right?

Heard's team is tweeting "mutual abuse". They pretend they are innocent bystanders but they are not.
It's especially obvious, it's them when their tweets and accounts disappear.

So, what I am trying to say is Heard still has no defense and other than her team, she still has very few public supporters.

So, she ain't winning in the court of pubic opinion which she set out to do. And she won't win in court.

So, give it up Heard.

AdeleAgain
Posts: 521
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 8:06 am
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by AdeleAgain » Mon May 25, 2020 3:08 am

A few random thoughts:

Interesting that whatever the MSM may be doing, there is no issue with JD now amongst the general public. It used to be that when anything was posted on line about Johnny, especially on twitter - while the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of the many, many comments would be supportive, there would be a healthy dose of 'abuser' comments. Now, someone like say Josh Gad who over the weekend posted that he had been educating his daughters with an acting masterclass by showing them Edward Scissorhands, gets nothing but lovely comments.

As you all know it always frustrated me so much that the MSM would report Johnny got loads of hate, but would NEVER admit that he also had more vocal support.

Also I notice now that the twitter accounts with tens and hundreds of thousands of followers tweet supportive things about him.

Now we have the situation where without doubt the tide has turned and there can be few people written about on line that get more negative comments than AH. Even on the heavily edited L'Oreal sites, her few remaining supporters (who you guys think are people close to her anyway??) are out numbered. But no one reports it. Why? I was wondering why the Daily Mail for instance which seems to have no problem running both negative pieces they've done themselves, as well as putting out the PR puff pieces which her team put up (oh exciting, she is standing in her drive), but why they haven't done something about this. It was the DM for instance that wrote the article pointing out that AH rolled her eyes, smirked and ate through her deposition - and that was influential. Then idiot that I am - realised L'Oreal advertise heavily with all the newspapers and magazines. I am not saying this will stop them reporting anti-AH stories but it will probably stop them reporting how much criticism L'Oreal specifically is getting.

Anyway, mad though I am driven that she gets such a free ride, and honestly why are L'Oreal back to putting her on their outputs? - nevertheless take comfort that Johnny gets massive on-line love. Continue to pray that the court case will go ahead in July and whilst there will be some rough moments no doubt, it will hopefully bring a judgement about the truthfulness of what she said and did.

Mutual abuse: this has to be the Sun and her own lawyers throwing her under the bus. She claimed she was terrified of the monster. She claimed she could never question his authority - which is how abusers work. She gave graphic descriptions of how Johnny, with the powers and strength of superman, would beat her. When her own words betray that fact that there is no way on this earth she was the little victim terrified of the monster. And there is also no way a single thing she says can be relied on because she has on multiple occasions lied to authorities and lied under oath.

Come on July.

MaryS
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue May 05, 2020 8:16 am
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by MaryS » Mon May 25, 2020 6:16 am

AdeleAgain - Interesting take on the *mutual abuse*. Either way it doesn't matter, Heard has no proof.

I think that even the twitter-ers who pretend to dislike both and pretend to be neutral are on her team. They always somehow slip in *mutual abuse*.

I am not on twitter but as you can tell I read a lot of tweets. It does give you a general feel of the situation. And Johnny is winning.

User avatar
Judymac
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 6:23 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Judymac » Mon May 25, 2020 9:45 am

justintime wrote:
Sun May 24, 2020 8:47 pm
Moonbeam wrote:
Sun May 24, 2020 6:09 pm
Here is another article from Medium.com, named 'Why Is This NYT Reporter Stalking Johnny Depp's Supporters?'. This is written by Robert Turner.

I think, see below, this may be the follow-up article Mr. Turner is promising in your post, Moonbeam. I’d posted it in this thread (p. 231), not knowing the article above was written first. They make sense when read together, first yours from May 12, 2020, then this next one (below) from May 14, 2020.
justintime wrote:
Thu May 14, 2020 11:13 pm
“The NYT Commits More Reporters to Their Depp Vendetta” from Robert Turner at Medium.com.
Very disturbing implications; validates what we think we’ve been seeing wrt the ramped-up and relentless, “truth-less” persecution of JD. Is Mr. Waldman who, apparently, has been a thorn in the NYT’s side for years the real target?
Also, I didn’t know AH wrote an op-Ed in the NYT this past Sunday, according to Mr. Turner (“On Sunday (May 10th?)she was allowed to pen an op-Ed in the NYT. The message is clear. We’re sticking with Amber. Again, the question why?). Did anyone happen to read it?


Judymac: I hope with all my heart you are right. It is articles like the above that are so worrisome.
This does not matter. This article is not evidence. Judges only consider the facts that have been put in evidence. The newspaper articles, fan reactions etc are not part of the evidence are not something that will not be considered. Even if they tried to get it put into evidence (at this late time) it probably would not be admitted. It is an opinion, not evidence. The U.S. judge has already made some ruling favorable to Johnny, so I believe that he is a fair judge. I wish I could make people understand that all the other stuff that they are worrying about does not matter. The only thing that matters is what has been put into evidence.

User avatar
Moonbeam
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: Neverland
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Moonbeam » Mon May 25, 2020 10:34 am

I DO Understand that the evidence before the court is all that Really Matters.
"Music touches us emotionally, where words alone can't."-- Johnny Depp..."The truth will come out...and I will be standing on the other side of the roaring rapids. I hope other people will too." --Johnny Depp #justiceforjohnnydepp

User avatar
Judymac
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 6:23 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Judymac » Mon May 25, 2020 11:22 am

Moonbeam wrote:
Mon May 25, 2020 10:34 am
I DO Understand that the evidence before the court is all that Really Matters.
Sorry my comments were meant for Justintime. I clicked on the wrong quote.

User avatar
Moonbeam
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: Neverland
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Moonbeam » Mon May 25, 2020 12:13 pm

Accepted.
"Music touches us emotionally, where words alone can't."-- Johnny Depp..."The truth will come out...and I will be standing on the other side of the roaring rapids. I hope other people will too." --Johnny Depp #justiceforjohnnydepp

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1099
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Mon May 25, 2020 2:13 pm

If Amber Heard's team and so called supporters are claiming "mutual abuse" then they are admitting she is an abuser.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
Chocolat
Posts: 9962
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 11:52 am
Location: Sleepy Hollow
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Chocolat » Mon May 25, 2020 3:03 pm

ForeverYoung wrote:
Mon May 25, 2020 2:13 pm
If Amber Heard's team and so called supporters are claiming "mutual abuse" then they are admitting she is an abuser.
The important point here is it's Amber Heard who needs to provide proof that she isn't an abuser. No chance that will happen.
~ MAGICK HAPPENS ~
Through the years, for the many xoxo's, giggles & kindness...
thank you & love you Johnny.

AdeleAgain
Posts: 521
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 8:06 am
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by AdeleAgain » Mon May 25, 2020 3:09 pm

Sorry I don't think I was very clear when I wondered if the mutual abuse was a throw-AH-under-the-bus by the Sun and the lawyers. So the Sun has to defend itself having called JD a wife beater. The tapes of her freely talking about whacking the hell out of him have really undermined her case (on top of the other evidence) - so could it be that the Sun are going to court saying "we didn't say she isn't a husband beater, we are just saying he hit her".

Of course this doesn't stack up at all, and the Sun are still going to have to prove that he hit her - but I wonder if they are trying to get out on a legal technicality which let's face it, is all either they or AH have now.

What I was trying to say is that the problem they have with this argument and relying on AH is that she said from the very beginning she was terrified of him.

And her word is proven to be unreliable.

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Mon May 25, 2020 4:15 pm

AdeleAgain wrote:
Mon May 25, 2020 3:09 pm
Sorry I don't think I was very clear when I wondered if the mutual abuse was a throw-AH-under-the-bus by the Sun and the lawyers. So the Sun has to defend itself having called JD a wife beater. The tapes of her freely talking about whacking the hell out of him have really undermined her case (on top of the other evidence) - so could it be that the Sun are going to court saying "we didn't say she isn't a husband beater, we are just saying he hit her".

Of course this doesn't stack up at all, and the Sun are still going to have to prove that he hit her - but I wonder if they are trying to get out on a legal technicality which let's face it, is all either they or AH have now.

What I was trying to say is that the problem they have with this argument and relying on AH is that she said from the very beginning she was terrified of him.

And her word is proven to be unreliable.
Your last few sentences are spot on. She said she lived in fear, and yet we have proof she not only harmed him, but initiated physical abuse. So this won't be cast as they are both abusers to absolve The Sun, therefore our article is correct. Her credibility is going to be tested. She lied, over and over, so when isn't she lying. Johnny is standing by he didn't abuse her, but did a few times push her away or push her arms down from hitting him. That isn't abuse. Even throwing a can back at her to get her to stop throwing things, is self-defense, not mutual abuse. It'll be up to the judge (on his own, no jury in The Sun case) to decide this.

justintime
Posts: 1736
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 6:39 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by justintime » Mon May 25, 2020 5:20 pm

Moonbeam wrote:
Mon May 25, 2020 10:34 am
I DO Understand that the evidence before the court is all that Really Matters.
Judymac wrote:
Mon May 25, 2020 11:22 am
Sorry my comments were meant for Justintime. I clicked on the wrong quote.
To clarify: My only reason for posting and commenting concern about the two related Medium.com articles by Mr. Turner was to bring attention to the current, full throttle effort and seriously questionable tactics of the NYT to undermine JD’s public support and and his legal team’s(!) credibility. Not case related evidence by any stretch. Just an ugly move by a usually respectable msm source. The question remains a multi-pronged, “Why?”
"Stay low." ~ JD
"I don't like it in here . . . it's terribly crowded." ~ Hatter
"There's something about Johnny that breaks your heart." ~ John Logan, ST
"Tear deeper, Mother." ~ Wilmot

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1099
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Mon May 25, 2020 7:00 pm

The reporter from NYT is trying desperately to find out of anyone from JD's team is contacting fans to post things. I think we have seen the connection behind The Sun and some of the big tabloids and it's pretty obvious the people with money are trying to control the media..maybe even payoffs, imo.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

MaryS
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue May 05, 2020 8:16 am
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by MaryS » Mon May 25, 2020 8:25 pm

Heard can't claim self defense.

Because if you look at all the evidence - the recordings, the texts etc. - she *starts* all the fights. Johnny in turn does NOT respond physically and splits all the time.

So, what does that leave Heard's team but "mutual abuse" even if she's called an abuser.

But Heard's foray in trying to prove that Johnny initiated any fight, for example, like the bruised eye has been DEBUNKED. She has been accused of painting on the bruise by Johnny's team and what with the video coverage showing no bruise, and her photo *evidence* lacking a date and/or time stamp, yeah, Heard should confess this hoax right now.

So, where does that leave Heard's team? Pretty stuffed I say.

Heard's only hope is that the Judge believes that there were *other* *imaginary* scenarios she's sure to come up with where Johnny was physically abusive. Yeah, she will supply NO proof but that hasn't stopped her before.

Look, the Judge does NOT believe Heard with her current story let alone any others she comes up with. Who would?

justintime
Posts: 1736
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 6:39 pm
Status: Offline

Re: The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by justintime » Mon May 25, 2020 10:53 pm

AH’s connections may be beyond the reach of truth and credibility, after all. How else to explain L’Oréal’s continued staunch backing of AH despite loud cries for her removal from the brand’s most recent promotions?

“....Heard is not without influential friends. Her attorney is Roberta Kaplan, the front for Times Up and Heard was recently seen enjoying the company of Kamala Harris, a potential running mate for Joe Biden.

Is is not unusual in our society to witness travesties of justice. Amber Heard could be one of these, unfolding in full view of the public, protected as she is by power and politics.

It would explain why a large multinational corporation such as L’Oréal would risk their companies reputation on her...”


https://medium.com/thecre8tive/loréal-s ... 35d294ad5a
"Stay low." ~ JD
"I don't like it in here . . . it's terribly crowded." ~ Hatter
"There's something about Johnny that breaks your heart." ~ John Logan, ST
"Tear deeper, Mother." ~ Wilmot