The Lawsuits Thread

Discuss the latest Johnny Depp news, his career, past and future projects, and other related issues.
User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Tue Oct 08, 2019 7:52 pm

Good victory and the selfie posted here clearly shows Brooks was in no pain whatsoever mentally or physically. :toastingpirates:

https://theblast.com/c/Johnny-depp-self ... ooks-trial
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:35 pm

I think what Waldman was trying to say that Johnny won his 4 motions and Brooks lost his one.


10/08/2019 Notice (of Ruling re Motions in Limine)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

10/07/2019 Notice (of Amended Deposition Testimony Designation and Objections - Deposition of John C. Depp, II)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

10/07/2019 Notice (of Amended Deposition Testimony Designation and Objections - Deposition of Gregg "Rocky" Brooks)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

10/02/2019 Witness List (JOINT WITNESS LIST)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

10/02/2019 Jury Instructions (JOINT AND OBJECTED TO JURY INSTRUCTIONS)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

10/02/2019 Exhibit List (JOINT EXHIBIT LIST)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

10/02/2019 Statement of the Case
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

10/02/2019 Stipulation - No Order (of Facts)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

10/02/2019 Trial Brief
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

10/02/2019 Notice (of Deposition Testimony Designation and Objections - Deposition of John C. Depp, II)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

10/02/2019 Notice (of Deposition Testimony Designation and Objections - Deposition of Gregg "Rocky" Brooks)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

09/30/2019 Reply (to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 4)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

09/30/2019 Reply (to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 2)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

09/25/2019 Opposition (PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE N0.4 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT REGARDING DISPUTES BETWEEN JOHN C. DEPP, II AND NONPARTY AMBER LAURA HEARD)
Filed by Gregg "Rocky" Brooks (Plaintiff)

09/25/2019 Opposition (PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE N0.2 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT REGARDING ALLEGED DRUG AND ALCOHOL USE BY JOHN C. DEPP, II)
Filed by Gregg "Rocky" Brooks (Plaintiff)

09/24/2019 Opposition (to Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Paragraph 12 of the Film LA Monitor Report)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

09/17/2019 Association of Attorney (NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL)
Filed by Gregg "Rocky" Brooks (Plaintiff)

09/13/2019 Motion in Limine (No. 4 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding Disputes with Amber Heard)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

09/13/2019 Motion in Limine (No. 3 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding Other Lawsuits)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

09/13/2019 Motion in Limine (No. 2 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Regarding Alleged Drug and Alcohol Use by John C. Depp, II)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

09/13/2019 Motion in Limine (No. 1 to Bifurcate the Punitive Damages Phase of the Trial)
Filed by John C. Depp (Defendant); Infinitum Nihil (Defendant)

09/13/2019 Motion in Limine (NO. 1)
Filed by Gregg "Rocky" Brooks (Plaintiff)
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
Chocolat
Posts: 9587
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 11:52 am
Location: Sleepy Hollow
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Chocolat » Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:29 pm

Elon Musk has been officially subpoenaed.

~ MAGICK HAPPENS ~
Through the years, for the many xoxo's, giggles & kindness...
thank you & love you Johnny.

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Wed Oct 09, 2019 6:22 pm

Oh boy, would I love to be in that deposition room. I can't wait until they subpoena James Franco too. :popcorn:
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
Chocolat
Posts: 9587
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 11:52 am
Location: Sleepy Hollow
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Chocolat » Wed Oct 09, 2019 6:35 pm

After James Franco, who else is left? IO, Whitney, Amanda D. the makeup artist?
~ MAGICK HAPPENS ~
Through the years, for the many xoxo's, giggles & kindness...
thank you & love you Johnny.

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:42 pm

Her former assistant Savanna McMillan, friends Helen Phillips and Rami Sarabi (her rich Syrian friend) and others who went to Coachella with her for her birthday after one of the alleged incidents. There is also her mother, whom she said that she confided in and let's not forget Amanda de Cadenet who tried to convince people that she was a victim. There are also people from the picnic her make up artist friend Elizabeth Marz hosted a day after the alleged incident in May 2016.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
Chocolat
Posts: 9587
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 11:52 am
Location: Sleepy Hollow
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Chocolat » Wed Oct 09, 2019 9:04 pm

Thanks. Yes, I was aware of Amanda (IMO, she needs to be subpoenaed as well as IO) and I was curious about Rami and, is it, Brandon, her close friend? At the time AH hung out with Cara Delevigne too. However, there really are only a few of those mentioned that would offer the specific info Waldman would be looking for.
~ MAGICK HAPPENS ~
Through the years, for the many xoxo's, giggles & kindness...
thank you & love you Johnny.

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Wed Oct 09, 2019 9:52 pm

Yes, Brandon McCulloch is a close friend but he doesn't seem to be involved in any of the alleged incidents. iO might get subpoenaed because in her statement she never said that Johnny yelled at her or called her names like Amber said in her declaration and she also said in her essay that she called the cops because she knew Amber would not do it, but Amber said she told iO to call the cops, so there is a lot of conflicting stories there. She isn't a good witness and has no photos to back up what she said she saw in the apartment even though she says she is a photographer.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
RumLover
Posts: 1368
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 5:02 am
Location: Sydney, AUS
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by RumLover » Thu Oct 10, 2019 1:43 am

I would like to hear testimony from Amber's mother. She has known Amber a long time.
The first time I read Amber's deposition about telling her mother, I thought that her mother was supporting the hoax by telling her to take photos.

So at the very beginning, I would only tell my mom who -- somebody who understands this sort of situation. And then I --
Q So your mom?
A And then I --
Q You told her that you had been physically abused by Johnny Depp?
A Yeah. I would tell her from the -- almost -- almost at the very beginning I confided in her. That's why I had pictures.

On reading again, I thought maybe Amber's mother was skeptical of Amber's story and was it was more like 'unless there are pictures, I don't believe you'.

I would like Amber's mother to be asked questions like "Is Amber a truthful person?" and "Has Amber previously made accusations about any person(s)?"

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:14 am

I bought the witness list for the Rocky Trial. I'm not comfortable posting here as its a public forum. Johnny's strongest witnesses are Emma and Brad. Rocky has a longer list but includes his sister and family therapist. Miriam Segal (who was originally being sued) is listed as a witness for Rocky. Rocky's list also included AH and Waldman, but I presume after the Final Conference Meeting they've been dropped (Adam said in The Blast that Rocky lost his motions so assume that was about bringing in AH, Alcohol/Drug allegations, and all his other lawsuits)

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:41 am



Depp's attorney Adam Waldman tells The Blast, "Today, one more whistleblower who doesn’t know Mr. Depp felt compelled to come forward to defend the truth by presenting a photograph and text exchanges. And yesterday, Judge Fujie denied all of Rocky Brooks’ motions, which were transparent attempts to turn his looming trial into a circus by citing irrelevancies like Amber Heard’s unrelated hoax allegations. Mr. Brooks’ motions exposed what his lawyers Tamar Arminak and Arbella Azizian meant when they said they were "working with Amber Heard’s counsel Eric George.” We intend to seek sanctions against Mr. Brooks counsel for malicious prosecution after the trial."
I originally posted and quoted the full article here early. The Blast has updated it and removed the portion I underlined above Hmmmm?

Oct 8, 2019 at 20:44 pm UTC / Last Updated at Oct 10, 2019 at 2:16 am UTC
By Mike Walters


Depp's attorney Adam Waldman tells The Blast, "Today, one more whistleblower who doesn’t know Mr. Depp felt compelled to come forward to defend the truth by presenting a photograph and text exchanges. And yesterday, Judge Fujie denied all of Rocky Brooks’ motions, which were transparent attempts to turn his looming trial into a circus by citing irrelevancies like Amber Heard’s unrelated hoax allegations. Mr. Brooks’ motions exposed what his lawyers meant when they said they were "working with Amber Heard’s counsel Eric George.”

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:42 am

Oh, a new Blast Article


Johnny Depp Scores Victory in Assault Battle, Amber Heard & Alleged Drug Use Off Limits During Trial



According to court documents obtained by The Blast, a Los Angeles judge sided with Depp and granted his motion. The motion sought to prohibit any evidence or testimony about his ex-wife or alleged drug use in a court case.

Earlier this year, Gregg “Rocky” Brooks sued Depp accusing him of assault on the film set for “City of Lies”. Depp has denied the allegations and claimed self-defense. The trial is scheduled to begin on October 21.

The actor was pleading for Heard and alleged drug use not be mentioned to the jury.
(I hope they can use/cite this ruling in the Defamation trial where they are asking for all this stuff, plus)

justintime
Posts: 1511
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 6:39 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by justintime » Thu Oct 10, 2019 1:14 pm

Lbock wrote:
Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:14 am
I bought the witness list for the Rocky Trial. I'm not comfortable posting here as its a public forum. Johnny's strongest witnesses are Emma and Brad. Rocky has a longer list but includes his sister and family therapist. Miriam Segal (who was originally being sued) is listed as a witness for Rocky. Rocky's list also included AH and Waldman, but I presume after the Final Conference Meeting they've been dropped (Adam said in The Blast that Rocky lost his motions so assume that was about bringing in AH, Alcohol/Drug allegations, and all his other lawsuits)
Wise decision, IMHO, Lbock. I’ve thought for a long while now that, perhaps, this thread should be open only to registered guests who have logged in. Would be a little inconvenient, but considering the ideas, suggestions, observations, comments etc., all based on almost two decades of following JD and all far more eloquent and factual than my own tirades, well, I’m just wondering if maybe it would be the right thing to do at this point. There is so much at stake for Johnny and there are now attorneys involved in both lawsuits with motives having nothing to do with truth or justice . . .

“Closing the barn door too late” maybe, but how ‘bout “better late than never” ?
"Stay low." ~ JD
"I don't like it in here . . . it's terribly crowded." ~ Hatter
"There's something about Johnny that breaks your heart." ~ John Logan, ST
"Tear deeper, Mother." ~ Wilmot

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Thu Oct 10, 2019 1:28 pm

justintime wrote:
Thu Oct 10, 2019 1:14 pm

Wise decision, IMHO, Lbock. I’ve thought for a long while now that, perhaps, this thread should be open only to registered guests who have logged in.

“Closing the barn door too late” maybe, but how ‘bout “better late than never” ?
I was thinking the same as we know they were here and pulled info. All the archive articles are there for their picking with little to no effort. But I've only just returned from a long hiatus...family and work changes.

Also, I googled "the blog" and this forum were the top links, so even the media can be trolling here.

User avatar
stroch
Posts: 1343
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: New Orleans
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by stroch » Thu Oct 10, 2019 5:05 pm

I think it should be private...actually, I thought it was.

We know about the excessive traffic at times, but we don't know who generates all of it. I guess the mods can see the IP addresses and can do a search if something seems suspicious.

Second edit: right now,I am the only registered member on line,but there are 513 guests.
I'll buy you the hat....a really big one.
St. Roch -- patron saint of pilgrims