JOHNNY DEPP ZONE

Thank you, Lbock, for that excellent link as well as your excerpts of particularly pertinent paragraphs. Does AH count as a “criminal accused”, a “criminal defendant”, both or neither . . . yet? My mind is spinning like a top with all the potential unsavory directions this case could go for AH at th...

Brian McPherson’s newest video:

">

I think you are right, Larkwoodgirl. And the fact is, he doesn’t need to reference her at all. More people than ever are aware, now, of the way things really played out between them. She’s long since passed the point of diminishing returns to benefit from ever more shocking “reveals”, falsehoods, an...

Are Johnny’s lawyers privy to the specifics of AH’s new sexual assault claims?

Thanks, Lbock, for the tidy summary of all the hoax facts, threads, and players. It’s daunting, but theories are rapidly morphing into facts now. Been a very long time coming.

....Cuts on the arm. My initial thought, with all the broken glass she caused on the counter..when she put the cigarette out on Johnny’s face with her right hand, she might lean on the counter on left fore arm. He could have even pushed her back or grabbed her arm and pulled her impulsively causing...

Thanks for posting those comparison photographs, Moonbeam. There is absolutely no similarity between AH’s “scratch” scars and the deep, ragged scars from actual broken glass cuts shown on an anonymous bearer on the next slide (tap “Show this thread”); the sole exception being the vertical direction ...

Oh my, who does she think she can bamboozle with her phony protestations and claims to a last minute ticket procurement - her monumental effort to do what is right despite the enormous risks to her own health and safety? AH really does believe she can wriggle the love and admiration of the rabble wi...

Aren’t all witnesses “third parties”, if not the Plaintiff or the Defendant? AH is not just a witness for the Defense. She is THE witness for the Defense - she and her years-long, ever evolving statements of increasingly horrific lies and wild tales are what NGN and Wooton have been counting on. Now...

Lbock wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 08, 2020 8:50 pm

What I’m Not sure about is if Johnny can be present

Good grief! How could the Plaintiff not be allowed to hear and see testimony as it’s being given in the case they initiated???

The rule in UK is people who claim sexual abuse/domestic violence usually get to testify in private. So the judge is only allowing a very small portion to be private. Thanks for the clarification. Given her claim, then, I guess she only was permitted the least accommodation possible. Good. Believe ...

I find the High Court’s ruling upsetting. I don’t care one iota about being privy to her testimony, nor how brief it may be. I just cannot stomach this vile creature being cut any quarter whatever. Any decision that carries the potential to cause more pain for Johnny and that can be thrashed around ...

Don’t know how reliable this may be, but it seems a bit less couched in “might be’s” than most reports of this ilk. From Laura B’s Twitter page: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/hollywood-abuser-amber-heard-fired-from-aquaman-2-after-domestic-violence-admission/ Until I read something from WB, however,...

. . . when he wins the judgement against her I don't think he will take action for the full amount, whatever that may be . . . We could very well see the headlines of him winning a "50 million dollar lawsuit" against her but behind the scenes he might only ask for his attorney fees and the refund o...

Thank you, Lbock.

Does anyone know if the (Rocky) Brooks lawsuit is still on schedule for trial(?) on May 11th? Is Patrick Harris still on Rocky’s legal team? If so, JD’s legal team will be working non-stop (not that they haven’t already been!) for quite some time: Brooks, May 11th; SUN UK, July; and AH Defamation VA...