JOHNNY DEPP ZONE

Ok thanks may be I am being slow tonight - how does it show her witnesses are cracking?

If Brandon is harassing JD's witnesses it needs to be properly reported and stopped. That is surely illegal.

Can anyone explain to me what TUG's video is about?

I know who Brandon is - but who did he message? And what's the 'gay thing"? What does this have to do with anything?

Sounds like the new witness has got some views on James Franco as well.

Also sorry back to Elaine publishing the addresses and phone numbers of the witnesses. Any views on what happens now? In Europe that kind of breach of privacy- anything to do with personal data- is very serious. I hope she gets sanctioned, it is just appalling - has she even apologised?

Thank you on both Lbock.

On Eric George - didn't he refuse to answer or said it was nothing to do with him, the hiring of that private detective who found nothing on JD but good things?

Wow I misunderstood I thought it was just JD's witnesses. That's just rank incompetence. Granna - I am going to write this because when I take a stance and pronounce on something I am usually very very wrong and I hope I am here. But I fear the rats aren't leaving the sinking ship - they are clingin...

Usual tacts from her side, very transparent. Note the use of Tracy Edwards quotes, totally out of context: "it's not going to be tolerated" - what wasn't going to be tolerated? "Disney won't put up with this" - won't put up with what? "No love lost between Johnny and Disney because of the Pirates 5 ...

When people/organisations are telling the truth they can easily point to evidence or supporting information. If the ACLU was using the logo in 2014 - which maybe they were incredibly organised and were - why not produce a letter or something which shows the logo? Simple, would shut down the argument...

It's a great review - I am not sure I would agree JD is alienating his fans, I rather think he's consolidated his international treasure status in the last couple of years - the review might want to plug into social media comments about him. But never mind.

Thanks for posting JD's reply Lbock; of course cannot discern with a lawyer's brain but did I understand correctly that AH's papers deliberately misrepresented legal precedents? Have I got that right? Be very glad of someone else's views.

Ok got through it all.

What a mess AH/ACLU - under Roberta Kaplan the argument for dismissal was this was nothing to do with JD. Does anyone get sanctioned for getting their lawyers to argue big fat lies?

I've only got as far as them having a lunch break but it is diamond. Ben Chew kept asking what due diligence he had done on whether AH had been abused by JD, I love the increasingly panicky objections of AH's and Eric George's own lawyers. Truth is of course a defence against defamation if Mr George...

Interesting assessment that the comms around her article may actually have more impact than the body cam or tapes.

This is a good thread on the perjury issue by Andrea.

Thank you again Lbock. Read it all - so interesting. Of course lawyers will be lawyers and they alway push the envelope for their client but Elaine appeared to go further than that. Fragrant misrepresentation on the police officers - actually outrageous. And other areas too including attempts to con...

Thank you Lbock I now get why the ACLU drafts are important, and that the email she wrote trying to insert more about JD is important. Really well explained also on the relevance of UK case. Been reading bits on twitter taking transcripts of various hearings - wow Elaine! I can see why she's AH's ad...