JOHNNY DEPP ZONE

Her dress is not flattering at all.

Can someone please explain the hearsay rules please? Surely you can testify to what someone told you, albeit that it is not given the same weight as if you actually witnessed something? I believe that's how it works in the UK - is the US different? I can see perhaps in a jury trial it would need to...

IO Tillet Wright Witness statement says Amber said, Stephen Deuters, Jerry Judge, Savannah McMillan and one or two others were on the plane." I wasn't debating who was on the plane or what happened on the plane. My point is that io can not testify that Amber told him who was on the plane. It is hear...

I am sorry if I upset you - I try to understand the legal aspect of it all - and much of it seems to be two sides of a coin. Did you mean me? You did not upset me. The VA case is a defamation case against Amber Heard. What Johnny has to prove is that what he says is more likely true than not true. ...

The statements about the Boston flight airplane incident seem problematic for both sides. There are inconsistencies about who was on plane. In Heard's first UK witness statement she says Keenan Wyatt, Stephen Deuters, Nathan Holmes, Jerry Judge, Savannah McMillan and flight attendant were on plane....

I am sorry if I upset you - I try to understand the legal aspect of it all - and much of it seems to be two sides of a coin. Did you mean me? You did not upset me. The VA case is a defamation case against Amber Heard. What Johnny has to prove is that what he says is more likely true than not true. ...

You are comparing the two cases. But, they are two different cases in two different courts in two different countries. There are different defendants in the two cases and the courts have different rules. The only thing that is the same in the case is Johnny and Amber. Johnny does not have to prove h...

Will the VA trial be about all 12 incidents? Or about the original 3? Adam seems to be a perfect fit to expose her publicly. But I question the legal strategy, I doubt that any pictures will have an impact, altough its a jury. In my opinion they need to focus on sworn testimony from Dr.Kipper and a...

AdeleAgain: patience. Keep educating, those who may support her. She wishes to maintain relevance in the media. Okay. Keep reminding everyone of the vile disgusting individual that she is. Keep showing your support, admiration, and love for our gentlemen. Justice is not always swift and above all, ...

I realize that everyone is really upset about this verdict. But the U.K court and the U.S. Courts are totally different. Just because she got away with perjury in the U.K. courts does not mean that she will get away with perjury in the U.S. court. The U.K court went very easy on her for her inconst...

This is what really :censored: ! That she got away with perjury on the stand and all the obvious lies. I have no hope that some of her friends will come forward about the hoax, there is just no reason to do it now! Two courts did not question their "evidence". One thing that might creep up on her i...

Previously, I had thought Heard had not given much information on her ACLU contact or writing the op-ed. But she did give names in a VA declaration. From last pages of 09/05/2019 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Amended Responsive Pleading. 3. Anthony Romero, the executive director of the ACLU,...

AdeleAgain wrote: I have to say I find it amazing that The Washington Post does get off totally free on this. They allowed her/the ACLU to use their platform and their name. They lent the entire thing their credibility. I'm guessing it's some form of safe harbour protection - something that is prob...

I have to say I find it amazing that The Washington Post does get off totally free on this. They allowed her/the ACLU to use their platform and their name. They lent the entire thing their credibility. They get off because they printed an opinion piece by Amber Heard. Because it is only Amber Heard...

AdeleAgain wrote: I have to say I find it amazing that The Washington Post does get off totally free on this. They allowed her/the ACLU to use their platform and their name. They lent the entire thing their credibility. I'm guessing it's some form of safe harbour protection - something that is prob...