Kathryn Leigh Scott Q&A #6

Authors of DARK SHADOWS: RETURN TO COLLINWOOD

Moderator: Liz

User avatar
Liz
ONBC Moderator
Posts: 12927
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: The Left Coast

Status: Offline

Kathryn Leigh Scott Q&A #6

Unread postby Liz » Wed May 16, 2012 2:55 pm

ONBC: It would be interesting to hear what you thought of Ben Cross's portrayal of Barnabas on the nighttime series.

Kathryn: I have never watched the series. I was working out of the country and never saw it.
You can't judge a book by its cover.

The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.

User avatar
Theresa
JDZ Webmaster
Posts: 24618
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 1:21 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Status: Offline

Re: Kathryn Leigh Scott Q&A #6

Unread postby Theresa » Wed May 16, 2012 3:29 pm

Funny, as much as I love watching Dark Shadows, I never watched the nighttime version. I guess, to me, Jonathan Frid was Barnabas. Period.

Um....until now, that is.
:biggrin:

User avatar
winona
Posts: 1688
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 1:43 pm
Location: Heart of the Rockies

Status: Offline

Re: Kathryn Leigh Scott Q&A #6

Unread postby winona » Wed May 16, 2012 3:37 pm

I did see a couple of episodes, it just didn't seem "right" somehow, but Johnny's Barnabas is all right with me :biggrin:
Because love has your face and body .....and your hands are tender and your mouth is sweet-and God has made no other eyes like yours. Walter Benton

User avatar
Liz
ONBC Moderator
Posts: 12927
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: The Left Coast

Status: Offline

Re: Kathryn Leigh Scott Q&A #6

Unread postby Liz » Wed May 16, 2012 3:45 pm

The 1991 series was totally off my radar. I had no idea. But back then, TV for me consisted of Sesame Street and Barney :lol: . I had no clue about 21 Jump Street either. :shocked:
You can't judge a book by its cover.

The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.

User avatar
shadowydog
Posts: 89520
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:47 pm

Status: Offline

Re: Kathryn Leigh Scott Q&A #6

Unread postby shadowydog » Wed May 16, 2012 4:00 pm

I saw parts of the original soap in the late 60s. Never knew there was a 90s version. Only saw the entire soap in reruns in the 90s. I have looked at bits and pieces of this 90s version years later and wasn't impressed.
I have nothing to do and all day to do it in.

User avatar
Liz
ONBC Moderator
Posts: 12927
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: The Left Coast

Status: Offline

Re: Kathryn Leigh Scott Q&A #6

Unread postby Liz » Wed May 16, 2012 4:18 pm

Here's the promo for what looks like the pilot. It gives you a feel for it.

[youtube]97m6aBjqXLo[/youtube]
You can't judge a book by its cover.

The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.

User avatar
SnoopyDances
Posts: 39806
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:12 pm
Location: Tashmore Lake

Status: Offline

Re: Kathryn Leigh Scott Q&A #6

Unread postby SnoopyDances » Thu May 17, 2012 12:40 am

Never knew about the 90s series until I got cable and they started showing it recently. Not impressed.

There was just something new and different about it in the 60s. My brother and I were much (much!) younger and really just like the fact that it had vampires, werewolves and witches. :lol: We couldn't tell you any of the plot lines. It was just different from everything else. :cape:

User avatar
nebraska
Posts: 25112
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 8:15 pm
Location: near Omaha

Status: Offline

Re: Kathryn Leigh Scott Q&A #6

Unread postby nebraska » Thu May 17, 2012 9:40 am

I have watched the 90s series on you tube, but since I never watched the 60s version I didn't have anything to compare it to, so I enjoyed it.


Return to “Kathryn Leigh Scott & Jim Pierson”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests