CATCF Tidbit #19 - BFG Copycat?

by Roald Dahl

Moderator: Liz

User avatar
Liz
ONBC Moderator
Posts: 12971
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: The Left Coast

Status: Offline

CATCF Tidbit #19 - BFG Copycat?

Unread postby Liz » Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:56 am

This article was written by Edwin McDowell and appeared in the July 16, 1982 edition of The New York Times.

"Visiting Royal Bedrooms"

BRITISH newspapers this week are filled with stories of the prowler who broke into Buckingham Palace, entered Queen Elizabeth's bedroom and spent 10 minutes sitting on her bed. The episode sounds bizarre enough to have come from a novel and, in fact, in October two publishers, Farrar, Straus & Giroux in the United States and Jonathan Cape in Britain, plan publication of Roald Dahl's The BFG, a children's book about a Big Friendly Giant who kidnaps Sophie from her orphanage bed and deposits her in the Queen's bedroom "with the Queen herself asleep in there behind the curtain not more than five yards away."

Parliament is reportedly up in arms over the real–life security lapse that allowed Michael Fagan to shin up a drainpipe, climb through a palace window and enter the Queen's bedroom undetected. In the fictional version, by the author of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and other well–known stories for children, the Queen "simply sat there staring wide–eyed and white–faced at the small girl who was perched on her windowsill in a nightie." But after the Queen gets over her surprise and puts on "a pale pink dressing gown and slippers," she talks at length with Sophie, then consents to chat from her bedroom window with the giant.

The Dahl work arrived at the publishers in November and was circulated only to the book clubs. So it is unlikely that Mr. Fagan knew of it, "unless he's a reader for the equivalent of the Book–of–the–Month Club," said Michael di Capua, editor in chief of Farrar, Straus & Giroux. Otherwise, he said, "It's an uncanny coincidence."


Image
You can't judge a book by its cover.

The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.

User avatar
suec
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:57 pm
Location: uk

Status: Offline

Unread postby suec » Sun Feb 20, 2005 3:54 pm

1982??? "Ah yes, I remember it well". Just wondering where the 23 years went while I wasn't looking. (Memo to self: stop blinking!) :-O
"Luck... inspiration... both only really happen to you when you empty your heart of ambition, purpose, and plan; when you give yourself, completely, to the golden, fate-filled moment."

User avatar
Liz
ONBC Moderator
Posts: 12971
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: The Left Coast

Status: Offline

Unread postby Liz » Sun Feb 20, 2005 4:21 pm

Don't even go there, Suec. I don't like to think about it. :-/
You can't judge a book by its cover.

The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.

lizbet
Posts: 679
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 8:27 pm
Location: London, Canada

Status: Offline

Unread postby lizbet » Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:10 pm

wow - when we start talking in two decade intervals and it seems like yesterday then yes - I agree we don't want to go there - but what a coincidence about the stories - guess an example of fact being AS strange as fiction :eyebrow:
trying to live in "a profound state of ignorance"


Return to “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest