Black Mass Question #9: Blurring The Line

by Dick Lehr & Gerard O'Neill

Moderator: Liz

User avatar
fireflydances
ONBC Moderator
Posts: 3206
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:15 pm
Location: under a pile of books
Contact:

Status: Offline

Black Mass Question #9: Blurring The Line

Unread postby fireflydances » Tue Oct 07, 2014 9:20 pm

From pg. 126: “John Connolly and John Morris were now the keepers of the Bulger flame inside the FBI. And for Boston’s increasingly fearsome foursome—Connolly, Morris, Bulger, and Flemmi—an era of good feeling had begun all around as the boundary lines between the good guys and bad guys blurred.”

What do you think of using criminals to advance your ends?
"Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed and some few to be chewed and digested." Sir Francis Bacon, Of Studies

User avatar
nebraska
Posts: 28413
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 8:15 pm
Location: near Omaha

Status: Offline

Re: Black Mass Question #9: Blurring The Line

Unread postby nebraska » Wed Oct 08, 2014 7:36 am

I have mixed feelings. Informants can certainly be helpful, they have knowledge and sources that would be difficult to obtain in any other way. But as the Whitey story illustrates, it is a dangerous game. There is much opportunity for abuse when collaborating with criminals. Particularly when the law enforcement officers involved are less ethical or more vulnerable. In a perfect world, we wouldn't need to work with criminals. But this is not a perfect world.

User avatar
Theresa
JDZ Webmaster
Posts: 26601
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 1:21 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Status: Online

Re: Black Mass Question #9: Blurring The Line

Unread postby Theresa » Wed Oct 08, 2014 9:36 pm

Unfortunately, I think sometimes cases can't be cracked without the assistance of informants.

Of course, Connelly and Morris blew it right from the start because FBI rules for informants stated that the leader (top dog, big guy, boss...) should never be cultivated as an informant because...well, I guess what happened between Connelly and Bulger could pretty much be considered a textbook case for why the boss shouldn't be used as the informant.

User avatar
Liz
ONBC Moderator
Posts: 12971
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: The Left Coast

Status: Offline

Re: Black Mass Question #9: Blurring The Line

Unread postby Liz » Thu Oct 09, 2014 12:59 am

Good point, Theresa. Informants should be lower down in the chain of command. Then you have the option of getting the boss. But once you make the boss an informant, you're sort of stuck.

And nebraska, I agree with you, that they can be helpful. But the FBI bumbled again and went too far, by choosing to get in bed with Whitey and Flemmi.
You can't judge a book by its cover.

The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.


Return to “Black Mass”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest