House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
Moderator: Liz
- fireflydances
- ONBC Moderator
- Posts: 3129
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:15 pm
- Location: under a pile of books
- Contact:
-
Status: Offline
House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
For its time House of Earth was a very radical book. It's erotic descriptions of love-making were radical. Its politics were radical. Is it still radical? Why?
"Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed and some few to be chewed and digested." Sir Francis Bacon, Of Studies
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
Judging by some of the spirited discussion here I would say yes, at least to a .degree.
"Radical " is one of those terms that can describe different things depending on your own beliefs. Usually someone is more easily described as being radical if their ideas are different from your own. Woody was quite political with his socialist leanings. I think in his own day that was probably seen as more extreme than we might see it today, but his beliefs spilled over into his art and his work, including House of Earth, so I think it would still raise quite a few eyebrows.
"Radical " is one of those terms that can describe different things depending on your own beliefs. Usually someone is more easily described as being radical if their ideas are different from your own. Woody was quite political with his socialist leanings. I think in his own day that was probably seen as more extreme than we might see it today, but his beliefs spilled over into his art and his work, including House of Earth, so I think it would still raise quite a few eyebrows.
- DeppInTheHeartOfTexas
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 10:43 pm
- Location: Austin
-
Status: Offline
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
I agree, nebraska. I think it depends on your own beliefs and standards as well as the cultural standards of the time. The opening chapter could certainly still be seen as unpublishable in some circles, maybe not necessarily radical. I think socialism will always be debateable because of differing political beliefs but it doesn't carry the same radical label it did in the past. The term radical might be too strong these days.
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming -
Wow! What a ride!
Wow! What a ride!
- Liz
- ONBC Moderator
- Posts: 12971
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:13 pm
- Location: The Left Coast
-
Status: Offline
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
I agree. It was radical for the times in which it was written - the first chapter, that is. But I don't think in a political sense. It wasn't any more radical than the Grapes of Wrath.
I think that maybe racy is a better word than radical.
I think that maybe racy is a better word than radical.
You can't judge a book by its cover.
The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.
The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.
- Theresa
- JDZ Webmaster
- Posts: 26349
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 1:21 am
- Location: Houston, Texas
-
Status: Offline
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
To me, instead of being radical now, it's more reflective. Reflective of the times, the people (and their language), the politics and the land.
- Liz
- ONBC Moderator
- Posts: 12971
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:13 pm
- Location: The Left Coast
-
Status: Offline
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
Reflective is a very good word for it, Theresa. I felt the same way.
You can't judge a book by its cover.
The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.
The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.
-
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:24 pm
- Location: Chicago or thereabouts
-
Status: Offline
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
Well said!Theresa wrote:To me, instead of being radical now, it's more reflective. Reflective of the times, the people (and their language), the politics and the land.

But now if you were to rewrite this story for modern times, with say, the story of some folks who lost their jobs, healthcare coverage and homes during the last recession... well then, you might just be talking radical again.

Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
But now if you were to rewrite this story for modern times, with say, the story of some folks who lost their jobs, healthcare coverage and homes during the last recession... well then, you might just be talking radical again.
Yup.
- Liz
- ONBC Moderator
- Posts: 12971
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:13 pm
- Location: The Left Coast
-
Status: Offline
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
Buster wrote:But now if you were to rewrite this story for modern times, with say, the story of some folks who lost their jobs, healthcare coverage and homes during the last recession... well then, you might just be talking radical again.
Yup.
All of those things have affected me. But I'm not radical yet. Maybe when Cobra ends in July.

You can't judge a book by its cover.
The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.
The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.
-
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:24 pm
- Location: Chicago or thereabouts
-
Status: Offline
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
Liz wrote:Buster wrote:But now if you were to rewrite this story for modern times, with say, the story of some folks who lost their jobs, healthcare coverage and homes during the last recession... well then, you might just be talking radical again.
Yup.
All of those things have affected me. But I'm not radical yet. Maybe when Cobra ends in July.My job doesn't provide benefits.
I know far too many people with similar situations.

Maybe we could use more songwriters like Guthrie, Dylan, Seeger, Springsteen and Strummer. Maybe we need some modern equivalents of Grapes and House of Earth? I wasn’t sure what to write in answer to the “what’s the point?” question. Well, maybe that's the point - to help people find their voice. Maybe that’s even one reason why JD and Douglas Brinkley published it now... I don't know...
Hopefully things will turn around for you soon.


Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
I think racey is a better description than radical. Woody's music might have been seen as radical in his lifetime. But when hearing his song "This land is mine land" I failed to see the radical message it maybe was saying. Perhaps I was blind to his real message. Too wrapped up in my own world of raising a family and making a home. Be strong Liz and hang in there! 

- FANtasticJD
- Posts: 9387
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:37 pm
- Location: CT
-
Status: Offline
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
ladylinn wrote:Woody's music might have been seen as radical in his lifetime. But when hearing his song "This land is mine land" I failed to see the radical message it maybe was saying. Perhaps I was blind to his real message.
Take another look at the lyrics of the song, especially the last two verses. Most of us just know the first few verses and they seem to be a celebration of the land. The final verses hammer home his message. From Arlo's website:
“Who wants to be normal when you can be unique?”
Helena Bonham Carter
Helena Bonham Carter
- Liz
- ONBC Moderator
- Posts: 12971
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:13 pm
- Location: The Left Coast
-
Status: Offline
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
FANtasticJD wrote:ladylinn wrote:Woody's music might have been seen as radical in his lifetime. But when hearing his song "This land is mine land" I failed to see the radical message it maybe was saying. Perhaps I was blind to his real message.
Take another look at the lyrics of the song, especially the last two verses. Most of us just know the first few verses and they seem to be a celebration of the land. The final verses hammer home his message. From Arlo's website:
Ha! "hammer home!" Good one, FAN.

I love those last two verses. The message is definitely there, but it's subtle.

Thanks RR and Ladylinn. I know I'm not alone. But at least I have a job. And I will prevail. I've got that American spirit ingrained in me.

You can't judge a book by its cover.
The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.
The only thing that matters is the ending. It's the most important part of the story.
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
RamblinRebel wrote
I think it would please Woody a whole lot to know that his voice still resonates as the voice of the people. His message of hopefulness, that ordinary people can make big changes happen, is very much needed today. People are exhausted by poverty, stress and overwork and need the spark of art and music to give them the energy to change things. Tired people become downtrodden, and too enervated to object to things they know need to be fixed.
Well, maybe that's the point - to help people find their voice. Maybe that’s even one reason why JD and Douglas Brinkley published it now...
I think it would please Woody a whole lot to know that his voice still resonates as the voice of the people. His message of hopefulness, that ordinary people can make big changes happen, is very much needed today. People are exhausted by poverty, stress and overwork and need the spark of art and music to give them the energy to change things. Tired people become downtrodden, and too enervated to object to things they know need to be fixed.
Re: House of Earth Question #30: A Radical Book
Thanks FAN for showing me the final verses of This Land. I did think it was a song of celebration. When singing this song in school I don't remember singing the last verses. "Hammer" is a good word on the message. During the time (long ago) when I was in school we seemed to ignore the controversial issues.
No waves allowed!!!!!

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest